• Member Portal
  • Cincy MLS
  • Events
  • Consumers
  • Your
    Membership
  • Professional
    Development
  • Professional
    Standards
  • Advocacy
    & Government Affairs
  • News
    & Events
  • About
    Us
  • Your Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Professional Standards
  • Advocacy & Government Affairs
  • News & Events
  • About Us
  • Member Portal
  • Cincy MLS
  • Commercial Properties
  • Events
  • Consumers

Important update regarding NAR ongoing dispute with the Department of Justice (DOJ)

Hello Local AEs,

 

I am writing to share an important update regarding our ongoing dispute with the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Please note that the following update is unrelated to the private class action litigation in which NAR is a defendant and NAR’s recent Settlement Agreement that, if approved, would resolve nationwide litigation over claims from home sellers related to broker commissions.

Today, NAR petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for a rehearing, challenging its ruling that would allow DOJ to reopen a previously closed investigation into NAR’s policies. You may recall we reached an agreement in 2020 to end an investigation into certain NAR policies—including the cooperative compensation rule and clear cooperation policy—provided that NAR modify four of its policies. NAR fully complied with that agreement.

 

Eight months later the DOJ resumed that same investigation, violating our agreement. We subsequently asked the D.C. District Court to prohibit the DOJ from pursuing its investigation. While the D.C. District Court ruled in our favor, DOJ appealed that decision and it was subsequently reversed by the D.C. Circuit. This leads us to our challenge today.

It is important to underscore that this dispute focuses only on DOJ’s ability to unilaterally withdraw from its settlement agreement with NAR, it does not address any of the Department’s claims about NAR policies or antitrust topics.

We believe this is a highly consequential government-contract-interpretation case and the impacts are far reaching. We are pursuing a rehearing as a step to continue to forcefully advocate for the interests of our members and underscore the flaws in the D.C. Circuit Court panel’s split ruling.

 

REALTOR® Magazine has written up the petition here where you can find additional information. As always, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Thank you,

Katie



Have a Question or Need Assistance?

Contact Us

400 E-Business Way, Suite 100
Sharonville, Ohio 45241
(513) 761-8800
(513) 761-8813

  • Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Notice
  • Accessibility
  • Invest in RPAC
  • The REALTOR® Party
  • REALTORS® Political Action Committee (RPAC)
  • Your Government
  • REALTOR® Recommendations
  • RPAC Major Investors
  • Government Affairs News: Listings, Laws, and Lobbying
  • News
  • Events
  • NAR Lawsuit Settlement
  • Sponsorship Kit
  • Classroom Rental
  • Continuing Education
    • RAGC Education Policies
  • Licensing & Renewal
  • Designations & Certifications
  • Code of Ethics
    • Code of Ethics Enforcement Processes
    • Filing an Ethics Complaint
  • Arbitration Requests
  • Pathways to Professionalism
  • Professional Standards Resources
  • Professional Standards News
  • Become a RAGC REALTOR®
  • Become an Affiliate Member
  • Affiliate Members
  • Experience the Benefits of Membership
  • Affinity Programs
  • Circle of Excellence Award
  • Staff
  • Directors
  • Committees
  • Brand Toolbox
  • REALTORS® with Heart
  • Real Estate Pathways Scholarship
  • Strategic Plan
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)
  • History